Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation
Oxford Law Citator
Venoklim Holding BV v Venezuela, Award and dissenting opinion, ICSID Case No ARB/12/22, IIC 683 (2015), 3rd April 2015, United Nations [UN]; World Bank; International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes [ICSID]

Reporter(s)

Laura Yvonne Zielinski
Sign up for alerts

Venoklim Holding BV v Venezuela, Award and dissenting opinion, ICSID Case No ARB/12/22, IIC 683 (2015), 3rd April 2015, United Nations [UN]; World Bank; International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes [ICSID]

Date:
03 April 2015
Citation(s):
ICSID Case No ARB/12/22 (Official Case No)
IIC 683 (2015) (OUP reference)
Content type:
Arbitral awards, Arbitral awards
Product:
Oxford Reports on International Law [ORIL]

Module:
International Investment Claims [IIC]
Jurisdiction:
United Nations [UN]; World Bank; International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes [ICSID]

From: Oxford Public International Law (http://opil.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All Rights Reserved.date: 06 July 2020

Whether ICSID proceedings were validly initiated when an investor filed its request for arbitration within the six months following the Respondent State’s denunciation of the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes Between States and Nationals of Other States under Article 71 but the proceedings were only registered after the expiration of the six-month period provided for by Article 71.

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.