Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation
Arif v Moldova, Award, ICSID Case No ARB/11/23, IIC 585 (2013), despatched 8th April 2013, United Nations [UN]; World Bank; International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes [ICSID]

Arif v Moldova, Award, ICSID Case No ARB/11/23, IIC 585 (2013), despatched 8th April 2013, United Nations [UN]; World Bank; International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes [ICSID]

From: Oxford Public International Law (http://opil.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All Rights Reserved.date: 14 October 2019

Whether the illegality of the investment defence could be raised to object to the Arbitral Tribunal’s jurisdiction.

Whether the frustration of the investor’s legitimate expectations amounted to a breach of the fair and equitable treatment standard contained in the provisions of the Agreement between France and Moldova on the Reciprocal promotion of Investments.

Whether reparation under the form of restitution was appropriate and to what extent moral damages could be awarded.

Whether the discounted cash flow method was appropriate to calculate the damages involving a business that never operated.

Whether simple or compound interest was best designed to ensure full reparation.

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.