Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation

AES Corporation v Argentina, Decision on jurisdiction, ICSID Case No ARB/02/17, (2005) 12 ICSID Rep 308, IIC 4 (2005), 26th April 2005, United Nations [UN]; World Bank; International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes [ICSID]

Date:
26 April 2005
Citation(s):
ICSID Case No ARB/02/17 (Official Case No)
(2005) 12 ICSID Rep 308 (Other Reference)
IIC 4 (2005) (OUP reference)
Content type:
Arbitral decisions
Product:
Oxford Reports on International Law [ORIL]

Module:
International Investment Claims [IIC]
Jurisdiction:
United Nations [UN]; World Bank; International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes [ICSID]

From: Oxford Public International Law (http://opil.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All Rights Reserved.date: 24 February 2020

Whether the Tribunal of the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (‘ICSID’) had jurisdiction to hear the case under Article 25 of the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes Between States and Nationals of Other States

Whether earlier decisions on jurisdiction in the Argentinean cases under the same Bi Lateral Investment Treaty had any relevance or were precedents.

The extent to which specific contract forum selection clauses precluded ICSID arbitration.

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.