Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation
Wena Hotels Limited v Egypt, Decision on Annulment Application, ICSID Case No ARB/98/4, (2004) 6 ICSID Rep 129, (2002) 41 ILM 933, (2003) 130 Clunet 167, IIC 274 (2002), 28th January 2002, despatched 5th February 2002, United Nations [UN]; World Bank; International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes [ICSID]

Reporter(s)

Jeffrey M Sullivan

Wena Hotels Limited v Egypt, Decision on Annulment Application, ICSID Case No ARB/98/4, (2004) 6 ICSID Rep 129, (2002) 41 ILM 933, (2003) 130 Clunet 167, IIC 274 (2002), 28th January 2002, despatched 5th February 2002, United Nations [UN]; World Bank; International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes [ICSID]

From: Oxford Public International Law (http://opil.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All Rights Reserved.date: 18 October 2019

Whether the original Tribunal manifestly exceeded its power by applying international law over Egyptian law.

Whether the original Tribunal manifestly exceeded its power by asserting claims on behalf of other investors.

Whether the original Tribunal seriously departed from a fundamental rule of procedure.

Whether the original Tribunal's award stated the reasons upon which it was based.

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.