Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation
Wena Hotels Limited v Egypt, Award, ICSID Case No ARB/98/4, (2004) 6 ICSID Rep 89, (2002) 41 ILM 896, IIC 273 (2000), 8th December 2000, United Nations [UN]; World Bank; International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes [ICSID]

Reporter(s)

Jeffrey M Sullivan

Wena Hotels Limited v Egypt, Award, ICSID Case No ARB/98/4, (2004) 6 ICSID Rep 89, (2002) 41 ILM 896, IIC 273 (2000), 8th December 2000, United Nations [UN]; World Bank; International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes [ICSID]

From: Oxford Public International Law (http://opil.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All Rights Reserved.date: 17 October 2019

Whether Egypt violated its obligations to provide Wena fair and equitable treatment, full protection and security and its obligation not to expropriate Wena's investment absent prompt, adequate and effective compensation.

What law was applicable to the arbitration and whether a municipal statute of limitation applied to the Egypt-UK BIT claims.

What the appropriate method was for calculating damages for expropriation.

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.