Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation
Asian Agricultural Products Limited v Sri Lanka, Final award on merits and damages, ICSID Case No ARB/87/3, (1991) 6 ICSID Rev-FILJ 526, (1997) 4 ICSID Rep 246, (1991) 30 ILM 577, (1992) XVII YB Com Arb 106, IIC 18 (1990), 21st June 1990, despatched 27th June 1990, United Nations [UN]; World Bank; International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes [ICSID]

Reporter(s)

Avanthi Gunatilake, Mayer Brown Rowe, Maw LLP

Asian Agricultural Products Limited v Sri Lanka, Final award on merits and damages, ICSID Case No ARB/87/3, (1991) 6 ICSID Rev-FILJ 526, (1997) 4 ICSID Rep 246, (1991) 30 ILM 577, (1992) XVII YB Com Arb 106, IIC 18 (1990), 21st June 1990, despatched 27th June 1990, United Nations [UN]; World Bank; International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes [ICSID]

From: Oxford Public International Law (http://opil.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All Rights Reserved.date: 13 October 2019

In the absence of an express agreement between the parties, how a tribunal was to determine the applicable law.

What the extent of state responsibility was, arising from a duty to provide full protection and security to a foreign investor.

Whether a state was liable to pay compensation for damages caused to the property of a foreign investor during combat.

What should be included in calculating compensation where there was no unlawful expropriation and the foreign investor was unable to demonstrate it had made profits.

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.