Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation
Metalclad Corporation v Mexico, Award, ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/97/1, (2001) 16 ICSID Rev-FILJ 168, (2001) 40 ILM 36, (2001) XXVI YB Com Arb 99, (2002) 119 ILR 618, (2002) 5 ICSID Rep 212, (2001) 13(1) World Trade and Arb Mat 45, IIC 161 (2000), 25th August 2000, despatched 30th August 2000, United Nations [UN]; World Bank; International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes [ICSID]

Metalclad Corporation v Mexico, Award, ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/97/1, (2001) 16 ICSID Rev-FILJ 168, (2001) 40 ILM 36, (2001) XXVI YB Com Arb 99, (2002) 119 ILR 618, (2002) 5 ICSID Rep 212, (2001) 13(1) World Trade and Arb Mat 45, IIC 161 (2000), 25th August 2000, despatched 30th August 2000, United Nations [UN]; World Bank; International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes [ICSID]

From: Oxford Public International Law (http://opil.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All Rights Reserved.date: 14 December 2019

Whether Mexico breached Articles 1105 (fair and equitable treatment) and Article 1110 (expropriation) of the North American Free Trade Agreement when, despite the fact that the Federal Government had granted a permit for the construction of the investor's hazardous waste disposal landfill and represented that no further license would be required, the municipal authorities declined a second permit and declared the area to be an ecological preserve.

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.