Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation
Case of Hilaire, Constantine and Benjamin et al v Trinidad and Tobago, Hilaire and ors v Trinidad and Tobago, Merits, reparations and costs, IACHR Series C no 9, IHRL 1477 (IACHR 2002), 21st June 2002, Inter-American Court of Human Rights [IACtHR]

Reporter(s)

Mary J Bortscheller, Isis Goldberg, Jennifer Jaimes

Case of Hilaire, Constantine and Benjamin et al v Trinidad and Tobago, Hilaire and ors v Trinidad and Tobago, Merits, reparations and costs, IACHR Series C no 9, IHRL 1477 (IACHR 2002), 21st June 2002, Inter-American Court of Human Rights [IACtHR]

From: Oxford Public International Law (http://opil.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All Rights Reserved.date: 15 November 2019

Whether a mandatory death penalty for convicted murderers, without consideration of circumstantial evidence and without possibility of amnesty, pardon, or commutation of the sentence, violated Articles 4 (right to life) and 2 of the American Convention on Human Rights (‘ACHR’) (domestic legal effects).

Whether Trinidad and Tobago violated the prisoners’ right to a fair trial with judicial protection during a criminal procedure within a reasonable time, as protected by Articles 7 (right to personal liberty), 8 (right to a fair trial), and 25 of the ACHR (right to judicial protection).

Whether Trinidad and Tobago violated Articles 4 (right to life) and 5 of the ACHR (right to humane treatment) when it subjected a prisoner to cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment before he was executed, although a case was pending before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.