Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation
Military I, Prosecutor v Bagosora (Théoneste) and ors, Decision on the Prosecutor’s motion for joinder, Case no ICTR-96-7, Case no ICTR-96-12, Case no ICTR-97-34, Case no ICTR-97-30, ICL 141 (ICTR 2000), 29th June 2000, United Nations [UN]; United Nations Security Council [UNSC]; International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda [ICTR]; Trial Chamber III [ICTR]

Reporter(s)

Samantha Salsench

Military I, Prosecutor v Bagosora (Théoneste) and ors, Decision on the Prosecutor’s motion for joinder, Case no ICTR-96-7, Case no ICTR-96-12, Case no ICTR-97-34, Case no ICTR-97-30, ICL 141 (ICTR 2000), 29th June 2000, United Nations [UN]; United Nations Security Council [UNSC]; International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda [ICTR]; Trial Chamber III [ICTR]

From: Oxford Public International Law (http://opil.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All Rights Reserved.date: 17 August 2019

Whether it was necessary at the pre-trial stage for the prosecution to provide evidence in affidavit format as a basis for joinder.

Under what conditions jointly charging and trying accused persons would be permissible.

To what extent the interests of justice and the rights of the accused were to be weighted before granting a joinder.

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.