Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation
The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law edited by Weller, Marc (1st January 2015)

Part III The Prohibition of the Use of Force, Self-Defence, and Other Concepts, Ch.29 Taming the Doctrine of Pre-Emption

Ashley S. Deeks

From: The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law

Edited By: Marc Weller

From: Oxford Public International Law (http://opil.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All Rights Reserved.date: 14 November 2019

Subject(s):
Self-defence — Weapons of mass destruction — Armed attack — Warfare, air — Armed forces — UN Charter — Terrorism — Terrorism, financing

This chapter examines one of the most contentious issues in the jus ad bellum: whether and when international law permits a state to use force unilaterally before it suffers an armed attack. More specifically, it considers whether pre-emption needs to be tamed. The discussion begins by sorting through the terminology used by states and scholars with respect to acts of self-defence in advance of an attack, with particular reference to three different terms: anticipatory self-defence, pre-emptive self-defence, and preventive self-defence. The chapter then outlines the basic positions in the historical debate about the legality of such self-defence before turning to three geopolitical and technological factors that put pressure on the doctrine of pre-attack self-defence: weapons of mass destruction, terrorism, and cyber attacks. Finally, it evaluates the future of pre-emption, with emphasis on changes in the timing of a state’s right to use force in self-defence.

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.