Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation
A Practitioner’s Guide to Maritime Boundary Delimitation by Fietta, Stephen; Cleverly, Robin (24th March 2016)

Part B Commentary on Judgments and Awards in Maritime Boundary Delimitation Disputes, 15 Cameroon v. Nigeria: Equatorial Guinea intervening (Judgment of the International Court of Justice, 10 October 2002)

From: A Practitioner’s Guide to Maritime Boundary Delimitation

Stephen Fietta, Robin Cleverly

From: Oxford Public International Law (http://opil.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All Rights Reserved.date: 21 February 2020

Subject(s):
Coastal states — Continental shelf — Islands and artificial islands — Delimitation — Straits — Territorial sea

The case described in this chapter is about the delimitation of the land and maritime boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria. This land boundary dispute extended from Lake Chad in the north to the Bakassi Peninsula in the south and the parties have adjacent coastlines abutting the Gulf of Guinea. The maritime areas in dispute along the eastern flank of the Niger Delta were highly prospective for oil and gas and there had been extensive oil activity on both the Nigerian and Cameroonian sides. However, overlapping oil concession blocks in the disputed area had restricted exploration and production. This is an example of a case, the chapter concludes, that concerned complex disputes over both land territory and maritime boundaries. This contrast illustrates the relative expediency with which arbitration proceedings can be conducted in such disputes as compared with proceedings before the court, particularly when both parties desire a rapid resolution.

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.