Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation
The Law of International Responsibility edited by Crawford, James; Pellet, Alain; Olleson, Simon; Parlett, Kate

Part V The Implementation of International Responsibility, Ch.76 Conciliation and Other Forms of Non-Binding Third Party Dispute Settlement

Nadine Susani

From: The Law of International Responsibility

Edited By: James Crawford, Alain Pellet, Simon Olleson, Kate Parlett

From: Oxford Public International Law (http://opil.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All Rights Reserved.date: 15 December 2019

Subject(s):
Responsibility of states — Reparations — Conciliation
The choice of a method of dispute resolution has important consequences for both the kind of outcome and the place that States accord to law in international relations. A judicial process would appear to be the ideal tool for establishing in an impartial fashion when a State’s responsibility is engaged and to ensure respect for the law. The continued performance of the obligation breached1 is one of the essential objectives of international responsibility, alongside the more traditional objectives of reparation.2 But recourse to a judge is far from being the...
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.