- Terrorism — Necessity — Self-defence — Sovereignty — UN Charter — Military matters
This chapter discusses the military operations against the Islamic State (ISIL or Da’esh) in Iraq as in Syria. After recalling the relevant facts and the context, it exposes the legal positions of the intervening states as well as those of the other states. In a third section some doubts are expressed concerning the legality of the operations based on the argument of self-defence, particularly when it implies the bombing of the Syrian territory without the consent of its government. In the same vein, a final section shows that the majority of states has not accepted the ‘unwilling or unable’, ‘limited sovereignty’, or ‘self-help’ necessity arguments, or, for that matter, the permissibility of preventive or pre-emptive self-defence. Accepting such arguments would undoubtedly imply at the very least a new interpretation of the UN Charter.
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full
to access all content.