Whether the Panel erred by concluding that Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (‘GATT 1994’) could not be applied independently in transitional situations where the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (‘SCM Agreement’) was not applicable pursuant to Article 32.3 of the SCM Agreement.
Whether the Panel erred by concluding that the inapplicability of Article VI of the GATT 1994 rendered Articles I and II of the GATT 1994 inapplicable.
Whether a state’s claims under Articles I and II of the GATT 1994 were within the terms of reference of the Panel.
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full
to access all content.