Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation
Kala Naft, Council of the European Union v Manufacturing Support and Procurement Kala Naft Company, Tehran, Judgment, ECLI:EU:C:2013:776, ILEC 107 (CJEU 2013), C-348/12 P, 28th November 2013, Court of Justice of the European Union [CJEU]; European Court of Justice [ECJ]; European Court of Justice (5th Chamber)

Reporter(s)

Severin Klinkmüller

Kala Naft, Council of the European Union v Manufacturing Support and Procurement Kala Naft Company, Tehran, Judgment, ECLI:EU:C:2013:776, ILEC 107 (CJEU 2013), C-348/12 P, 28th November 2013, Court of Justice of the European Union [CJEU]; European Court of Justice [ECJ]; European Court of Justice (5th Chamber)

From: Oxford Public International Law (http://opil.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All Rights Reserved.date: 16 June 2019

To what extent United Nations (UN) Security Council resolutions adopting sanctions against countries were relevant for the interpretation of European Union (EU) Council acts that sought to implement such international sanctions into EU law.

Whether EU Council acts seeking to implement international sanctions adopted by the UN Security Council relied on the respective Security Council resolutions as their legal basis.

Whether the EU Council had the power to adopt sanctions going beyond and independent from those adopted by the UN Security Council.

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.