Whether domestic courts were precluded from ruling on the merits of a case regarding a core area of sovereign action of a state because it would violate the principle of sovereign immunity of states.
Whether a domestic law that imposed reductions in the salary of a school teacher working abroad constituted a sovereign act of state and therefore, foreign courts were barred from issuing a ruling due to the domestic state’s invocation of sovereign immunity of states.
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full
content. Please,
subscribe
or
login
to access all content.