Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation
Urbaser SA and Consorcio de Aguas Bilbao Bizkaia, Bilbao Biskaia Ur Partzuergoa v Argentina, Decision on jurisdiction, ICSID Case No ARB/07/26, IIC 969 (2012), 19th December 2012, United Nations [UN]; World Bank; International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes [ICSID]

Urbaser SA and Consorcio de Aguas Bilbao Bizkaia, Bilbao Biskaia Ur Partzuergoa v Argentina, Decision on jurisdiction, ICSID Case No ARB/07/26, IIC 969 (2012), 19th December 2012, United Nations [UN]; World Bank; International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes [ICSID]

From: Oxford Public International Law (http://opil.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All Rights Reserved.date: 06 July 2020

Whether an investor always had to meet the requirement under the applicable bilateral investment treaty (‘BIT’) to submit a dispute first to a local court of the host state for 18 months before submitting it to arbitration.

Whether indirect shareholding interests were protected under the Agreement on the Reciprocal Promotion and Protection of Investments between the Argentine Republic and the Kingdom of Spain.

Whether the claimants complied with the domestic law of the host state.

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.