Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation
Bridgestone Licensing Services Incorporated and Bridgestone Americas Incorporated v Panama, Decision on expedited objections, ICSID Case No ARB/16/34, IIC 1273 (2017), despatched 13th December 2017, United Nations [UN]; World Bank; International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes [ICSID]

Bridgestone Licensing Services Incorporated and Bridgestone Americas Incorporated v Panama, Decision on expedited objections, ICSID Case No ARB/16/34, IIC 1273 (2017), despatched 13th December 2017, United Nations [UN]; World Bank; International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes [ICSID]

From: Oxford Public International Law (http://opil.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All Rights Reserved.date: 21 February 2020

1. This case concerns a dispute submitted to the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (“ICSID” or the “Centre”) on the basis of the United States-Panama Trade Promotion Agreement signed on 28 June 2007, in force on 31 October 2012 (the “TPA”), and the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States, which entered into force on 14 October 1966 (the “ICSID Convention”). 2. The Claimants are Bridgestone Licensing Services, Inc. (“BSLS”), a company incorporated in the State of Delaware, United...
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.