Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation
Dubrovnik, Prosecutor v Strugar (Pavle), Judgment, Case No IT-01-42-T, ICL 976 (ICTY 2005), 31st January 2005, United Nations [UN]; United Nations Security Council [UNSC]; International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia [ICTY]; Trial Chamber II [ICTY]

Dubrovnik, Prosecutor v Strugar (Pavle), Judgment, Case No IT-01-42-T, ICL 976 (ICTY 2005), 31st January 2005, United Nations [UN]; United Nations Security Council [UNSC]; International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia [ICTY]; Trial Chamber II [ICTY]

From: Oxford Public International Law (http://opil.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All Rights Reserved.date: 11 July 2020

Whether an attack against civilians could be justified by military necessity.

Whether special protection given to cultural property was lost if the said property was in the immediate vicinity of military objectives.

Whether a formal superior-subordinate relationship was required for ordering the commission of a crime.

Whether a cause-effect relationship was required between the conduct of an aider and abettor and the commission of the crime.

Whether a commander was liable for the crimes committed by a subordinate two levels down in the chain of command.

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.