Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation
Prosecutor v Tadić, Prosecutor v Dusko Tadić, Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction, Case No IT-94-1-AR72, OXIO 62, (1996) 35 ILM 32, 2nd October 1995, United Nations [UN]; United Nations Security Council [UNSC]; International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia [ICTY]

Prosecutor v Tadić, Prosecutor v Dusko Tadić, Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction, Case No IT-94-1-AR72, OXIO 62, (1996) 35 ILM 32, 2nd October 1995, United Nations [UN]; United Nations Security Council [UNSC]; International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia [ICTY]

From: Oxford Public International Law (http://opil.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All Rights Reserved.date: 13 December 2019

Whether the Appeals Chamber was permitted to examine the legality of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia's (‘ICTY’) establishment as part of a challenge to jurisdiction in interlocutory appeal proceedings.

What impact the characterization of a conflict as international or non-international had on the ICTY's subject-matter jurisdiction.

Whether it was necessary when prosecuting crimes against humanity to establish a nexus with an armed conflict.

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.