Whether, and to what extent, the accused’s increased knowledge of the scope of the case and evidence against him bore on the assessment of the risk of flight to the requisite standard.
Whether and to what extent the accused’s increased knowledge of incriminating evidence, including the identity of witnesses, bore on the assessment of the risk of obstruction of the proceedings by interference with witnesses and victims.
Whether, and to what extent, the accused’s increased knowledge of incriminating evidence bore on the assessment of the risk of commission of further crimes.
Whether the conditions proposed by the Defence for conditional release, or any other limitation imposed by the Pre-Trial Judge, could mitigate the risks of flight, obstruction of the proceedings, and commission of further crimes justifying the continuity of detention.
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full
content. Please,
subscribe
or
login
to access all content.