Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation

Nzabonimpa et al, Prosecutor v Turinabo (Maximilien) and ors, Decision on Maximilien Turinabo's, Anselme Nzabonimpa's, and Marie Rose Fatuma's motions challenging the form of the indictment, Case No MICT-18-116-PT, ICL 1150 (MICT 2019), 12th March 2019, United Nations [UN]; United Nations Security Council [UNSC]; International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals [IRMCT]

From: Oxford Public International Law (http://opil.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2022. All Rights Reserved.date: 02 December 2022

Whether the omission of some facts, or inclusion of imprecise and insufficient details, specifically regarding time, location(s), and the identity of a victim, could impair an accused’s ability to prepare their defence.

Whether alternative and cumulative pleading of facts in support of liability would render an indictment deficient.

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.