Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation

Prosecutor (on behalf of Legal Representative of Victims) v Ayyash (Salim Jamil) and ors, Decision on appeal by counsel for Mr Oneissi against the Trial Chamber’s decision on the legality of the transfer of call data records, Case no STL-11-01/T/AC/AR126.9, ICL 1052 (STL 2015), 28th July 2015, Special Tribunal for Lebanon [STL]; Appeals Chamber [STL]

From: Oxford Public International Law (http://opil.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All Rights Reserved.date: 11 August 2020

Whether an international independent investigation commission and a Prosecutor could legally request and obtain call data records without judicial authorization.

Whether call data records fell under the right to privacy and required prior judicial authorization over access to them and whether their use should be proportionate.

Whether the absence of judicial control regarding access to telephone records violated any international human rights standard on the right to privacy and justified the exclusion of call data records under Rule 162 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Special Tribunal for Lebanon

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.