Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation
Prosecutor v Ayyash (Salim Jamil) and ors, Decision on three prosecution motions for the admission into evidence of mobile telephone documents, Case no STL-11-01/T/TC, ICL 1047 (STL 2015), 6th March 2015, Special Tribunal for Lebanon [STL]; Trial Chamber [STL]

Reporter(s)

Elizabeth Santalla Vargas

Prosecutor v Ayyash (Salim Jamil) and ors, Decision on three prosecution motions for the admission into evidence of mobile telephone documents, Case no STL-11-01/T/TC, ICL 1047 (STL 2015), 6th March 2015, Special Tribunal for Lebanon [STL]; Trial Chamber [STL]

From: Oxford Public International Law (http://opil.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All Rights Reserved.date: 23 August 2019

Whether the Trial Chamber could have admitted documents from the bar table into evidence under Rule 154 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the Special Tribunal for the Lebanon (the ‘Rules’) without requiring prior witness testimony to confirm its reliability or provide further contextualization.

Whether the Trial Chamber could have allowed the prosecution to add extracts of documents already incorporated in its exhibit list under Rule 91 of the Rules.

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.