Whether the United States Schedule under the General Agreement on Trade in Services included specific commitments on gambling and betting services notwithstanding the fact that the words ‘gambling and betting services’ did not appear in the US Schedule.
Whether US federal and state laws prohibiting the cross-border supply of gambling and betting services where specific commitments had been undertaken, amounted to a ‘zero quota’ that fell within the scope of, and was prohibited by, Article XVI:2(a) and Article XVI:2(c) of the General Agreement on Trade in Services.
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please subscribe, or log in via the Sign in panel on the left of this screen to access all subscribed content.