In the case concerning the Arrest Warrant of II April 2000, the Court was concerned to establish whether the immunities of a Foreign Minister can protect him when he is accused of war crimes or crimes against humanity. In this connection, it referred to ‘those few decisions of national higher courts, such as the House of Lords or the French Court of Cassation’ which were relevant to the matter.508 However this reference is made in the context of the Court’s examination of ‘State practice’, pointing to the existence or otherwise of a rule in ‘customary...
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full
content. Please,
subscribe
or
login
to access all content.