In the earlier article on this subject, the distinction drawn by Fitzmaurice between the terms ‘jurisdiction’ and ‘competence’ was examined, but for the reasons there given, it was indicated that that distinction would not be pursued, the two terms being treated as effectively synonymous.1 None of the Court decisions given in the intervening period has made it necessary to open the question. In that article, the opportunity was taken to examine ‘the significance of a contention or a finding that the Court has jurisdiction in a particular case’, and it was...
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full
content. Please,
subscribe
or
login
to access all content.