In the earlier article in this series, it was observed that ‘[i]n general, the formality of a treaty as an instrument for embodying or recording consent renders superfluous any enquiry into the steps by which its precise terms were arrived at’, and it was suggested that for this reason ‘the familiar common-law concepts of offer and acceptance, the backbone of the law of contracts, usually have no role to play in the law of treaties.’18 Some exceptions to this were noted, including the jurisdictional problems in the Monetary Gold case. A further situation in which...
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full
content. Please,
subscribe
or
login
to access all content.