The question of the interaction of the forms of reparation in the international legal order was resolved by the ILC in an apparently simple way, structured on the basis of a hierarchical principle: priority is to be given to restitution; then immediately following restitution are the forms of reparation by equivalent: compensation first and satisfaction where compensation is not possible.1 This is presented as the codification of customary law and has been widely accepted in international legal doctrine. And yet, a survey of practice evidences a much more...
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full
content. Please,
subscribe
or
login
to access all content.