It is stated at the outset to Part Two of the ILC’s Commentary to ARSIWA that: Whereas Part One of the articles defines the general conditions necessary for State Responsibility to arise, Part Two deals with the legal consequences for the responsible State.1 These consequences are described as giving rise to a ‘new legal relationship which arises upon the commission by a State of an internationally wrongful act’.2 This marks the arrival point along the road set out for the Commission by Roberto Ago during the period 1973–9. His point of departure was that the...
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full
content. Please,
subscribe
or
login
to access all content.