It is not an overstatement to posit that international criminal law (ICL) has never seen anything quite like what has been dubbed the ‘specific direction saga’. The drama began when the Appeals Chamber of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) in the Perišić1 case acquitted the accused of crimes against humanity and war crimes on the basis that the actus reus of aiding and abetting required not only that he substantially contributed to the commission of crimes (by providing practical assistance, encouragement, or moral support), but...
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full
content. Please,
subscribe
or
login
to access all content.