- Browse all
- Content type
-
- Commentary and analysis
- Book content
- Encyclopedia entries
- Notes
-
- International instruments and materials
- Treaties
- Supporting instruments
- Institutional rules
- Resolutions
- Declarations
- Model laws
- Subject
- Author
- Geographic region
- Organization
-
My Content
(0)
Recently viewed (0)
-
My Searches (0)
Recently viewed (0)
- Save
- Cite
-
Email this content
Share Link
Copy this link, or click below to email it to a friendEmail this contentor copy the link directly:The link was not copied. Your current browser may not support copying via this button.Link copied successfully
Sign in
- Preliminary Material
- Dedication
- Foreword by Michael Wood
- Preface
- Table of Contents
- Table of Cases
- International Court of Justice/Permanent Court of International Justice
- International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia
- International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda
- Special Tribunal for Lebanon
- World Trade Organization Appellate Body
- European Court of Human Rights
- Inter-American Court of Human Rights
- Inter-American Commission on Human Rights
- Germany-Venezuela Mixed Claims Commission
- Eritrea-Ethiopia Claims Commission
- Ad Hoc Arbitrations
- Domestic Courts
- Table of Treaties
- Main Text
- Introduction
- Part I The Origin and Legal Source of the Persistent Objector Rule
- Part II The Criteria for the Operation of the Persistent Objector Rule
- 3 The Objection Criterion
- 4 The Persistence Criterion
- 5 The Consistency Criterion
- 6 The Timeliness Criterion
- I Timeliness and the Subsequent Objector Rule
- II The Commonly Advanced Justifications for the Timeliness Criterion Are Unsatisfactory
- III Pragmatic Justifications for the Timeliness Criterion and the Justifications Advanced for the Subsequent Objector Rule
- i The destabilizing implications of the subsequent objector rule
- ii The implications of the subsequent objector rule for the development of legal norms
- iii The implications of the subsequent objector rule for norm violation
- iv Proposed safeguards for subsequent objection
- v Prioritizing pragmatism over voluntarism
- IV The Timeline of a Customary Norm’s Development
- V States That Are Unaware of the Norm’s Gestation
- VI States With No Interest in the Emerging Norm
- VII ‘Instant’ or ‘Accelerated’ Customary International Law
- VIII New States
- IX Restrictions on When States Can Object Even Within the ‘Period of Emergence’?
- X Continued Objection Post-Crystallization
- XI Conclusion
- Part III The Limitations and Role of the Persistent Objector Rule
- 7 Peremptory Norms and Persistent Objection
- I The Nature of Peremptory Norms
- II Clarifying the Majority View: Peremptory Norms and the ‘Decay’ of Persistent Objector Status
- III The Rationale for the Majority View on Persistent Objection and Peremptory Norms
- IV Persistent Objection to Peremptory Norms in State Practice
- V Persistent Objection to the Jus Cogens Project
- VI Conclusion
- 8 Maintaining Exemption: ‘Fundamental’ Norms and Extra-Legal Factors
- 9 The Role and Value of the Persistent Objector Rule
- I Voluntarist Theory and the Persistent Objector Rule
- II The Communitarian Alternative to Voluntarism and Its Perception of the Persistent Objector Rule
- III The Chaotic Reality of Customary International Law
- IV The Limits of a Theoretical Approach to Assessing the Role of the Persistent Objector Rule
- V A Focus on the Practical Benefits of the Rule
- VI The Persistent Objector Rule as a Safety Valve
- VII The Persistent Objector Rule and the Development of Customary International Law
- VIII The Role of State Perception
- IX Conclusion
- Conclusion
- 7 Peremptory Norms and Persistent Objection
- Further Material
- [3.235.60.197]
- 3.235.60.197
