Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation

Obdeijn v Secretary-General of the United Nations, 16th March 2012, OXIO 384

United Nations Appeals Tribunal [UNAT]; United Nations [UN]

From: Oxford Public International Law (http://opil.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2023. All Rights Reserved.date: 28 February 2024

Subject(s):
Burden of proof — Settlement of employment disputes — Due process — Evidence
1. Whether non-renewal of a fixed-term appointment by an administrative body of the United Nations carries the obligation to provide a reasoned decision. 2. The burden of proof in cases where the respondent failed to provide a reason for non-renewal of a fixed-term appointment as per a United Nations Dispute Tribunal (UNDT) or United Nations Appeals Tribunal (UNAT) order. 3. The consequences of a failure to disclose the reason for non-renewal of a fixed-term appointment in response to a UNDT or UNAT order.This headnote pertains to: Obdeijn v Secretary-General of...
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.