Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation
Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Procedural Law [MPEiPro]

Declaration Under Security Council Resolution 9 (1946)

Eleni Methymaki

Content type:
Encyclopedia entries
Product:
Max Planck Encyclopedias of International Law [MPIL]

Module:
Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Procedural Law [MPEiPro]
Article last updated:
May 2021

From: Oxford Public International Law (http://opil.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2023. All Rights Reserved.date: 25 September 2023

Subject(s):
Statehood, legitimacy — Resolutions of international organizations — International courts and tribunals, procedure — Consent to jurisdiction — Standing

Published under the direction of Hélène Ruiz Fabri, with the support of the Department of International Law and Dispute Resolution, under the auspices of the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for Procedural Law.

1 With membership of the United Nations (‘UN’) being almost universal, up until 2018 scholars would invariably assert that Article 35 (2) of the Statute of the International Court of Justice (‘ICJ Statute’ or ‘Statute’) and UN Security Council (‘UNSC’) Resolution (‘Res’) 9 (1946) of 15 October 1946 had lost most of their contemporary relevance (Quintana, 2015, 7; Kolb, 2013, 287; Shaw, 2016, para 170; Oellers-Frahm, 2012, mn 11; Zimmermann, 2019, mn 53). After all, the last declaration under UNSC Res 9 (1946) had been deposited by Germany in 1971 (see para 52...
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.