Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation
Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Procedural Law [MPEiPro]

Opinion: European Court of Justice (ECJ)

Marise Cremona

From: Oxford Public International Law (http://opil.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2023. All Rights Reserved.date: 22 February 2024

Subject(s):
Deliberation and drafting — Advisory opinions — Standard of review

Published under the direction of Hélène Ruiz Fabri, with the support of the Department of International Law and Dispute Resolution, under the auspices of the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for Procedural Law.

1 Although international agreements may be considered by the European Court of Justice (‘Court of Justice’ or ‘Court’) in the context of its general jurisdictional mandate, whether judicial review (eg Commission v Council, Judgment of the Court, 1971 (‘Case 22/70’); France v Commission, Judgment of the Court (Full Chamber), 1991 (‘C-327/91’)), enforcement actions (eg Commission v Ireland, 2002; Commission v Sweden, 2010), or the preliminary reference procedure (Lesoochranárske zoskupenie VLK v Ministerstvo životného prostredia Slovenskej republiky, 2011; SECIL –...
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.