Whether the Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as interpreted by the European Court of Human Rights (‘ECtHR’) and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, as interpreted by the United Nations Human Rights Committee, supported a discretionary stay of proceedings on double jeopardy grounds when criminal proceedings were initiated for facts which were already subject to disciplinary proceedings
Whether Hong Kong courts were subject to the same precedential, coherence, and political constraints bearing upon the ECtHR.
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full
content. Please,
subscribe
or
login
to access all content.