Whether the refusal to provide reasonable accommodation in the form sign language interpretation or real-time steno-captioning to enable the participation of deaf people in jury duty, constituted a breach of the rights to equality and non-discrimination, access to justice, freedom of expression, and participation in public life, as guaranteed under Articles 5, 13, 21, and 29 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full
content. Please,
subscribe
or
login
to access all content.
