Whether Trial Chamber V had erred in finding that, for the purpose of providing notice to the accused, it was not necessary for the charges to set out the constituent legal elements of the alleged mode of liability under Article 25(3)(a) of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.
Whether the Chamber had erred in finding that the Defence was sufficiently informed of the contours of the ‘common plan’ and the accused’s alleged ‘essential contribution’.
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full
content. Please,
subscribe
or
login
to access all content.