Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation

Reporter(s)

Elizabeth Santalla Vargas

Prosecution v Turinabo (Maximilien) and ors, Decision on Prosecution appeal against decision granting Marie Rose Fatuma provisional release, issued on 16 May 2019 (public redacted version), Case No MICT-18-116-AR68.1, ICL 1167 (MICT 2019), 6th June 2019, United Nations [UN]; United Nations Security Council [UNSC]; International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals [IRMCT]; Appeals Chamber [MICT]

From: Oxford Public International Law (http://opil.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2023. All Rights Reserved.date: 20 April 2024

Whether the confirmation of the indictment in a contempt case concerning witness interference was sufficient in itself to meet the risk-assessment justifying refusal of provisional release under Rule 68(B) of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the Mechanism for International Criminal Tribunals.

Whether state guarantees for ensuring compliance with the conditions imposed by the judiciary were a prerequisite for granting provisional release.

Whether the Single Judge had correctly exercised his discretion in granting provisional release.

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.