Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation

Part IV Invalidity and Termination of Treaties, 20 Absolute Invalidity of Treaties and Their Non-Recognition by Third States

Alessandra Gianelli

From: The Law of Treaties Beyond the Vienna Convention

Edited By: Enzo Cannizzaro

From: Oxford Public International Law (http://opil.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2023. All Rights Reserved.date: 30 September 2023

Treaties, invalidity, termination, suspension, withdrawal — Treaties, effect for third states — Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties

The 1969 Vienna Convention leaves to States parties a treaty invalid because of its conflict with a peremptory norm the initiative, and the choice of having the International Court of Justice declare the invalidity or of reaching an agreement to the same result. The Vienna Convention provides a similar solution with regard to the invalidity of treaties concluded as a result of coercion. According to widespread opinion, third States may not consider those treaties invalid independently from the parties' action. This outcome is particularly problematic, given that both are cases of so-called absolute invalidity, where nullity is the consequence of a contrast with rules of fundamental importance in contemporary international law. This chapter explores ways in which third States may invoke such an absolute invalidity, reaching the conclusion that through the well-established practice of non-recognition States have long declared their intention to consider treaties in such cases invalid, notwithstanding any lack of initiative of the States parties.

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.