Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation

Difference over compliance with Award No 1/05 commenced by the Eastern Republic of Uruguay (Article 30 Protocol of Olivos), Uruguay v Argentina, Award, Award 01/2008, ITL 128 (MERCOSUR 2008), 25th April 2008, Permanent Review Court

From: Oxford Public International Law (http://opil.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All Rights Reserved.date: 20 April 2019

Whether and to what extent the MERCOSUR Permanent Appeals Court had jurisdiction to consider matters not raised by the parties at the time of adoption of an award of the Court in proceedings for non-compliance with the award.

Whether and to what extent measures adopted, or to be adopted, by a respondent, had to comply with criteria for lawfulness set out in the award, non-compliance by the respondent forming a sufficient ground for the adoption of compensatory measures by the claimant.

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.