Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation
Prosecutor v Bagilishema (Ignace), Appeal Judgment (Reasons), Case No ICTR-95-1A-A, ICL 136 (ICTR 2002), 3rd July 2002, United Nations [UN]; United Nations Security Council [UNSC]; International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda [ICTR]; Appeals Chamber [ICTR]

Prosecutor v Bagilishema (Ignace), Appeal Judgment (Reasons), Case No ICTR-95-1A-A, ICL 136 (ICTR 2002), 3rd July 2002, United Nations [UN]; United Nations Security Council [UNSC]; International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda [ICTR]; Appeals Chamber [ICTR]

From: Oxford Public International Law (http://opil.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All Rights Reserved.date: 26 April 2019

The standard of review for alleged errors of fact.

Whether the doctrine of superior responsibility could be established only by virtue of a person's de jure authority or whether their de facto exercise of powers of command and control should also be taken into account.

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.