Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation
Prosecutor v Semanza (Laurent), Judgment and sentence, Case no ICTR-97-20-T, ICL 859 (ICTR 2003), 15th May 2003, United Nations [UN]; United Nations Security Council [UNSC]; International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda [ICTR]; Trial Chamber III [ICTR]

Reporter(s)

Patricia Gehrig, Kerry Sun

Prosecutor v Semanza (Laurent), Judgment and sentence, Case no ICTR-97-20-T, ICL 859 (ICTR 2003), 15th May 2003, United Nations [UN]; United Nations Security Council [UNSC]; International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda [ICTR]; Trial Chamber III [ICTR]

From: Oxford Public International Law (http://opil.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All Rights Reserved.date: 26 April 2019

What the specific intent requirement of genocide was.

Whether the protected group for the purposes of genocide was assessed subjectively or objectively.

What the difference was between the crimes of murder and extermination.

Under what circumstances cumulative convictions based on the same facts were permissible.

What the relationship was between complicity and aiding and abetting liability for genocide.

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.